Authors: Erik_Knobl, Kempsterrr, Chuck
Summary
This is a proposal to define Stewards, a role tasked with ratifying the medium-term goals for the DAO, and empowered to do that via authority over budgets and Operators. Stewards would become the new ācoreā team, an energetic, elected group of people who would push the DAO forward.
Scope of Work
This proposal will formalize a council of Stewards, with the following definitions:
- Role Description. Definition of the scope of the role.
- Membership and Composition. Defining who can have the role and how.
- Obligations and Accountability. Defining how the DAO has oversight on their activities.
- Temporality and Rewards.
1. Role Description
Stewards are elected members of Developer DAO with proven experience as contributors in the DAO. Itās an ongoing role which requires active participation. The main task of the Stewards is defining the strategic goals of Developer DAO in the medium-term, and ensuring its alignment with the Mission. In order to achieve that, they have the following duties:
1.1 DAO Strategy
The main task for Stewards is defining and executing medium-term strategic goals for the DAO, ensuring they are aligned with the core Mission and Values. These goals include:
- Treasury strategy for the DAO, both $CODE and other assets with a focus on long-term growth and sustainability.
- Seasonal focus for the DAO, based on open retro and planning sessions for all members to participate in.
- Any legal issues needed for the DAO to deliver its desired goals.
1.2 Review Budgets Proposals
(This description replaces the acts described in P-17: Reward Contributions in $CODE and P-15: DAO Operators for Budget Stewards).
Stewards must review proposed budgets, and express their opinion regarding them, with the purpose of ensuring fairness for contributors, taking into account the overall financial health of the DAO. Stewards must ensure that budget proposals contain clear expected outcomes. In many cases these expected outcomes will be quantitative. In all cases, the expected outcomes can be used to frame a conversation with those receiving funding about progress and whether the project should pivot or persevere.
The following are the actions they can perform while reviewing budgets:
- ENDORSEMENT. This action certifies the budget, allowing it to continue with the process. At least 3 endorsements from 3 different Stewards are required for each budget.
- CHALLENGE. This action asks for clarification on specific points, up to the whole budget, or asks for correction of any specific items. The team proposing the budget (the Team) is required to respond to this action. Failure to respond to any Challenges will render any budget void for the season.
If the Team and the challenging Steward canāt reach an agreement, any side can ask for a vote of the whole Counsel of Stewards by tagging all Stewards in the Stewards channel in Discord, and giving opportunity for both sides to express their opinion. The vote will last for 72 hours after being triggered, and will be solved by basic majority vote of the acting Stewards. If the vote ends in a tie or in favor of the Team, the budget will be able to continue the process. Any budget can have any number of votes called on different items, but only one for each specific item.
1.3 Revoke Budget
(This description replaces the acts described in P-17: Reward Contributions in $CODE for Budget Stewards).
If any Guild, Project or Initiative with an active budget fails to deliver Status Reports, or any Steward has any reason to suspect bad behavior in an individual and/or Team, any Steward can trigger a vote to revoke the allocation of the budget in any given month and/or permanently, by stating the case in the Stewards channel, tagging all Stewards, and giving opportunity for both sides to express their opinion and debate prior to the vote. Each Steward can only trigger this vote once on a specific Team.
The vote will last for 72 hours after being triggered, and will be solved by basic majority vote of the acting Stewards. If the vote ends in a tie or in favor of the Team, the budget will be able to continue the process.
1.4 Hire DAO Operators
(This description replaces the acts described in P-15: DAO Operators for Budget Stewards).
At the insistence of any member of the DAO, or any Guild including a new Operator in their Budget, any Steward can trigger the process to discuss a new Operator role by stating the case and propose a basic definition of the role in the Stewards channel, tagging all Stewards.
All the council must have at least 7 days to express their opinions for the role, and after that, an open, recorded meeting must be set for a majority of the Stewards to attend, ending with a simple majority vote.
If the vote is affirmative, the role will start the DDIP process, while each Steward will have 7 days to nominate individuals and/or teams of up to three persons to perform the role. Once the DDIP process has been completed, the nominations will be elevated to a Snapshot directly.
In the case of DAO Operators as Guild Leaders, this actions includes basic oversight in the process to elect them, ensuring elections are done in an open and transparent process.
1.5 Remove DAO Operators
(This description replaces the acts described in P-15: DAO Operators for Budget Stewards).
At the insistence of any member of the DAO, any Steward can trigger the process to remove an Operator by stating the case in the Stewards channel, tagging all Stewards, and giving opportunity for both sides to express their opinion. All Stewards must have at least 7 days to express their opinions in the case, investigate allegations, and after that, an open, recorded meeting must be set for a majority of the Stewards to attend, ending with a simple majority vote. If the vote is affirmative, the removal will be effective immediately.
2. Membership and Composition
2.1 Basic Definitions
The Council of Stewards is composed of:
- All current DAO Operators.
- All current Guild Leads.
- 1-3 elected members.
The appointment of Operators is covered in the P15: DAO Operators, and each Guild is free to define the rules for elections of its own Guild Lead.
2.2 Elections
The following are the rules for the election of the 3 elected members of the Council of Stewards:
They must have one or more of the following requisites, in addition to being members of Developer DAO:
- The candidate has performed as a core team member of a guild or project.
- The candidate is involved in the management of the multisig safe of a guild or project.
- The candidate has performed one of the following roles: Initiative Lead, Advisor.
- The candidate has been a Steward previously.
- The candidate is being sponsored by at least three current Stewards.
Failure to comply with any of the previous requisites will make the nomination void.
Elections of the 3 members will be done during the offseason, when their term is completed. The elections will be managed by a Coordination Operator. The process must have the following phases:
ANNOUNCEMENT: At least 3 days and no more than 7 days must be given for the community to learn about the process, where and how it will happen, and the rules for it.
NOMINATIONS: At least 3 days and no more than 7 days must be given for potential candidates to nominate themselves, by writing a post in the designed channel explaining the reasons, motivations and profile of the nominee. At least 2 nominees must be declared for the election.
CONVERSATIONS: At least one open meeting must take place with the nominees, for the community to be able to have a conversation with them. Considerations about time zones must be taken always.
VOTE: A special Snapshot vote must be done with all nominees listed in alphabetical order, with voting open for at least 3 days and no more than 7 days. The top 3 will be elected as Stewards. If there is a tie in the 3rd place, all tied members will become Stewards. If the nominees are 3 or less than 3, the last place in the voting will not be appointed Steward.
TRAINING: All newly appointed Stewards must complete a common training so that they are all aware of the same mission, expectations for the role, and systems and processes that they need to work within.
2.3 Resignation
Any Steward can resign at any time to the role, just by making the announcement in the Stewards channel. By doing so, he/she would lose the right to any payments for performing the role for that month and afterwards. If the person resigning also would leave an Operator or Guild Lead role, the replacement for those roles would take over the role as a Steward as well when appointed. If the person resigning is only a Steward, the role would remain unoccupied for the rest of the season, and an election would take place in the next offseason to fill the empty seat.
2.4 Diversity
In an effort to encourage a more diverse leadership in the DAO, the following action should be taken by the Council of Stewards:
ENCOURAGEMENT: All members should reach out to minority members who comply with the requisites to invite them to post their nominations as Stewards.
3. Obligations and Accountability
3.1 Monthly Council
The main action point for Stewards is the assistance to the Council of Stewards, where status of the different initiatives should be shared. Each Steward is expected to attend more than half of these meetings during the season, and vote on the proposals. Before the end of each āSeasonal Monthā (i.e. before the DAO moves into the next month of a Season rather than calendar month), a council must be held to make decisions ahead of the next monthās budget allocations.
BEFORE THE COUNCIL
- Guild Leads, Operators and Project Champions must provide their monthly update at least X days before the meeting as per P17: Rewarding Contributions in $CODE.
- Coordination Operation to share Financial Accounts including:
- P&L
- Balance Sheet
- Cash Flow Forecast
- Coordination Operator collects requests, creates and shares a clear agenda for Stewards at least 72 hours before the meeting.
COUNCIL FORMAT (Chaired by Coordination Operator)
-
Accept/reject allocation of previously authorised Seasonal Budgets to Guilds and Projects.
-
Review request for budget amends from Guilds and Projects.
-
Review request for operational expenses (SaaS licenses, legal costs).
-
The Council of Stewards is appointed to be able to make decisions on any proposals related to the scope of the Stewards can be voted on this meeting, as long as the following requisites have been completed:
- The proposal should have been posted in the forum for at least 72 hours, given ample time for members and other Stewards to read it.
- No Steward has expressed opposition to the proposal.
-
If no-one contests, decisions are made during meeting and documented
-
If someone contests, decision goes to a poll vote open to the whole DAO with 3 options:
- Yes
- No
- Needs info or amend (pushes decision to next Council meeting)
3.2 Transparency
The council formation, deliberation and decision process needs to be fully transparent. This means that, from the very beginning, they need to ensure that members of the DAO can follow along or catch up easily to past or active proposals. The following are the basic communication channels Stewards must maintain:
- Regular, recorded meetings.
- A public Discord channel where all Stewardsā async deliberation takes place. No DMs for Stewards business should take place.
- Section in Probably Nothing devoted to Stewards deliberation and decisions.
Stewards can rotate responsibility for sharing their reasoning for budget decisions with the DAO publicly. Both assenting and dissenting views should be published.
4. Temporality and Rewards
4.1 Temporality
The role of Stewards will be held differently: Operators and Guild Leads will be Stewards for as long as they hold their other role. The elected Stewards will hold the role for two seasons, with the option of continual reelection. The goal is to provide enough time for a Steward to be able to implement their strategic medium-term goals.
4.2 Rewards
Each Steward will be rewarded with 1,000 $CODE monthly for their service to the DAO.
- Yes - Move Proposal to Snapshot
- Not yet - The proposal still needs changes.
- No - Do not move proposal to Snapshot
0 voters