Sharing some info here that influence this proposal:
D4R Contract / NFT
| Criteria | Count |
|---|---|
| Fixed Supply | 8,000 |
| Already minted | 7,887 |
Available to mind via ownerClaim |
113 |
When the contract was deployed 223 tokens from 7777 - 8000 were reserved for the owner to clam, 113 of these are remaining to be claimed. Calling the owner method on the contract returns this address - 0x91D7a9e7C09477392290FE16c1b243E4A36d279a
Believe this is @dabit3 - sure he’d be happy to transfer ownership to the DAO if asked.
re above, we’re not able to do this.
Secondary Markets
NFT Marketplaces on ethereum no longer enforce royalties (Opensea, looksrare) which means revenue on secondary market sales (only way we can earn from D4R) is very limited - sellers/buyers can opt into royalties on Opensea however out of the 17 listed there atm only 3 of those are opted in.
–
Given the above, my perspective is if we switch to the D4R it’s a temp solution whilst we work on a new membership NFT on an L2 (or alt-l1) for cheap gas and with parameters (price etc.) controlled by the community on-chain via Governance.
Curious if this changes your view on the proposal @mannyornothing @ntindle
@mannyornothing could you update this proposal to use Updated Proposal Template for DDIP