Based on the relationship of the last Agency proposal (Q4 2023) and its dependency on the DAO for promoting service-providing gigs within Agency, I consider the model not to be a success.
The exclusive focus on service providing will cease in the way it is currently modelled within the actual context of the DAO and participants of the Agency.
The curated group and its value will be maintained for anyone willing to participate in it, along with the current members, but its main focus is going to shift back to basics that not depending on specific actors. Instead, it will focus on the build aspect of product and reuniting a group of curated individuals from the D_D DAO to test, experiment, and exchange web3 ideas in a builder first safe space that ignites them. With the aim to build a first layer of a known network to support each other in (potential) ventures and ideas discussion and execution.
- Agency becomes “3 Club”
- Opening the window to others to cover the service-providing area. If someone is interested in pushing this forward, I am willing to have a talk.
- Focusing back on shared projects and the infusion of entrepreneurial spirit without constraints. Just a group of curated people and what they generate.
No specific business acumen is arranged, no return, just the opt-in existence of it from the DAO, based on projects and 3Club member-based invitations and referrals.
The initial group will start with the current Agency members, and from there, it will grow based on members inviting others if they consider suitable for participation in Club, no specific lead structure anymore.
(as service provider)
Agency value and incentive structure will continue as is, since the incentives and members value will not change. If there are other people/projects looking to offer an Agency solution in the DAO, we are willing to offer our values to them.
If a potential gig/project coming specifically from the DAO network or Labs is successful, then the 10% return on revenue generated from that specific project will continue effectively as proposed in past Q4 proposal. But no expectancies are on top of that in order for the group to exist.
The percentage based on each project is completely negotiable up to the person who brings it in.
We won’t ask for CODE this Q1, as there is enough CODE in the actual Agency’s safe to reward this new structure if required.
Thinking yet if this needs a SubDAO Coordinator Role. I cannot see it clearly right now.
Publishing it to know your views and push the idea forward and avoid stagnation.
More details as they ocur