I voted no because getting DDIP right is so critical for our DAO that I want to return this proposal to discussion for amendment. (It’s scary to oppose things publicly! I hope no one sees this as personal in any way.) I hold the timelines are too short to be safe in all cases. 50,000 $CODE is also too simple here, in the case we’re vesting from 20,000 (which I support, see [DRAFT] Ratify the Early Contributor Allocations of $CODE https://forum.developerdao.com/t/draft-ratify-the-early-contributor-allocations-of-code/ )
Looking forward to working together to make this even better, to lay a strong foundation for our governance processes for years to come.
This proposal is fundamentally good and has my support in essence, however I believe it is not ready for ratification.
(This is now effectively a governance experiment to see if we can work with amendments through the forum. I personally urge that we vote no and amend.)