On balance, whilst I personally recognise the concerns with coordinape potentially being a popularity contest I think it would be be a better approach than Guild leaders allocating.
My thoughts here are:
- Guild leaders are not going to notice/appreciate everyones contribution (whereas a member might have worked with a less visible person on an initiative and be able to rewarded them)
- Guild leaders deciding seems more centralised and less fair
- There is nothing in place for Guild leaders to track contributions currently and not clear to me how those decisions would be made without more contention and/or a very long and drawn out process of gathering and figuring out contributions
I’d like to propose we separate out the allocations a bit further i.e.:
- Airdrop to all NFT holders (total % / ~5300)
- Airdrop to anyone who voted in first two snapshots or picked up a POAP (total % / 907)
- Allocation to be distributed via coordinape for Season 0 contributions (total % / guilds, then by coordinape)
By breaking out the allocation to voted on first two proposal and then Season 0 rewards we can reward with early contributors and current contributors respectively, including those who maybe aren’t actively contributor to guilds/projects now but have been big contributors to the community as whole.
When I think about those kind of people I’m sure most of them voted on the snapshot proposals or picked up a POAP (but would need to check).
Unfortunately whatever we decide together there’s not doubt in my mind were’ going to miss a few people’s extra contributions but this feels like it’s getting us closer without creating massive overhead to launching the token that will slow us down. (could be over cooking that bit !!)
I’m working on a post documenting how we might structure the DAO and rewards mechanisms after Season 0 which I hope to share in the next few days (bit messy/unorganised at the moment). Believe having some clarity on this might help alongside the tokenomics.